NEDOQwen: An Auditable Low-Cost Diagnosis-and-Repair Study for a Turkish-Centric 0.824B Language Model
A version-aware study of evaluation mismatch, tokenizer coverage, answer-label bias, and targeted repair in a Turkish-centric small language model.
This manuscript is available as a Research Square preprint and has not undergone journal peer review.
Author abstract
Abstract
Small language models can make non-English model development more accessible, but internal prompt checks and language-specific design choices may obscure substantial external failures. We present NEDOQwen, a Turkish-centric 824M-parameter decoder-only research model, as an auditable case study in low-cost diagnosis and targeted repair. Clean supervised fine-tuning improves internal Turkish instruction diagnostics, while public Turkish and Turkic multiple-choice slices reveal weak academic knowledge, tokenizer coverage limitations, and severe answer-label bias. A 600-step repair stage increases TurkishMMLU-sub accuracy from 18.11% to 21.00% and TUMLU-mini Turkish accuracy from 21.33% to 32.22% under a common zero-shot answer-label log-probability protocol. An answer-label-only ablation reaches 19.56% and 27.00%, showing that calibration explains part, but not all, of the observed gains. Prediction distributions remain strongly concentrated on C and D, and qualitative failures persist. The contribution is therefore not a state-of-the-art Turkish model, but a version-aware, low-cost workflow for exposing internal–external evaluation mismatch, auditing tokenizer behavior, and reporting partial repair without mistaking benchmark gains for broad competence.
Research question
What does a small model’s internal progress hide?
NEDOQwen asks whether apparently improved Turkish instruction behavior survives external evaluation, and whether a tightly scoped repair stage can correct the failures without overstating general model competence. The study combines benchmark accuracy, prediction-label distributions, tokenizer diagnostics, qualitative checks, and exact artifact provenance.
Results
Key findings
External evaluation reveals weak performance.
The clean-SFT model reaches 18.11% on TurkishMMLU-sub and 21.33% on the Turkish TUMLU-mini slice.
Targeted repair produces uneven gains.
Full repair reaches 21.00% on TurkishMMLU-sub and 32.22% on TUMLU-mini Turkish.
Calibration explains only part of the change.
An answer-label-only ablation improves both benchmarks, but remains below the full repair model.
Answer-label bias persists.
Repair reduces extreme concentration on C but leaves a strong C/D prediction skew.
Experimental design
Method at a glance
- Model
- 824,256,000-parameter decoder-only causal language model
- Architecture
- 24 layers, 1536 hidden size, grouped-query attention, RoPE, RMSNorm, and SwiGLU
- Tokenizer
- 65,536-token Turkish-aware typed-surface vocabulary
- Context
- 1,024 tokens
- Evaluation
- 900-item TurkishMMLU-sub and 900-item TUMLU-mini Turkish slices
- Protocol
- Zero-shot answer-label log-probability scoring under a common evaluation harness
- Repair
- 600 steps over 2,005 targeted repair rows mixed with 2,000 clean instruction rows
- Compute
- Approximately 0.465 GPU-hours for the targeted repair stage
Artifact provenance
Public releases and evaluated checkpoints are versioned separately
The public Hugging Face base and SFT repositories belong to the stable step-5000 lineage. The report’s principal benchmark results come from a later experimental step-9000 clean-SFT checkpoint, its answer-label-only ablation, and the full repair-v2-600 checkpoint. The public models are useful research artifacts, but they should not be treated as the exact source of the reported repair results.
Version-aware reporting prevents a public checkpoint from being mistaken for a different evaluated model merely because both share the NEDOQwen name.
Open research
Code, models, and datasets
Artifact status: The GitHub repository contains training, encoding, SFT, sampling, and inspection code. Hugging Face hosts the large checkpoints and datasets. The public models are from the step-5000 lineage; exact experimental repair checkpoints are not represented by these two model pages.
Scope
Limitations
- The study does not include blinded human evaluation.
- The reported gains do not establish broad Turkish-language competence or state-of-the-art performance.
- Prediction-label skew remains substantial after repair.
- Tokenizer compactness and unknown-token measurements are diagnostics, not evidence of a causal effect on benchmark accuracy.
- The two current public model repositories do not contain the exact evaluated step-9000 and repair-600 checkpoints.
Compute support
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TRUBA) for providing computational resources used in this study. This support was provided in kind, and no grant or award number was issued.
Reuse and citation
Cite this preprint
Öztürk, A. R., Dalar, Y. E., Aksoy, Ö. F., Sezer, N. M., & Salihoğlu, F. A. (2026). NEDOQwen: An Auditable Low-Cost Diagnosis-and-Repair Study for a Turkish-Centric 0.824B Language Model. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10384535/v1
@article{ozturk2026nedoqwen,
title = {NEDOQwen: An Auditable Low-Cost Diagnosis-and-Repair Study
for a Turkish-Centric 0.824B Language Model},
author = {Öztürk, Ahmet Rıfat and Dalar, Yağız Ekrem and
Aksoy, Ömer Faruk and Sezer, Nedim Mutlu and
Salihoğlu, Feyzi Arda},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-10384535/v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10384535/v1},
note = {Preprint}
}
Quick answers
Questions this study answers
What is NEDOQwen?
NEDOQwen is a custom 824M-parameter, Turkish-centric decoder-only research language model built with a 65K Turkish-aware tokenizer and a Qwen/Llama-style architecture.
Did repair make NEDOQwen state of the art?
No. Repair improved the two reported evaluation slices, especially TUMLU-mini Turkish, but the model remains weak and important biases persist.
Can the public Hugging Face models reproduce every reported result?
No. The current public models are from the step-5000 lineage, while the principal report results use later step-9000 and repair-600 experimental checkpoints.
Are the code and training datasets public?
Yes. The code is available on GitHub, while the base model, SFT model, tokenized pretraining corpus, and SFT mixtures are available through Ethosoft on Hugging Face.